STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC FEATURES OF LIGHT INDUSTRY AND TEXTILE TERMS IN ENGLISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/mesmj-V5-I8-44%20Keywords:
English terms, structural, semantic, features, light industry and textile terms.Abstract
This article deals with the structural-semantic features of terminology related to light industry and textiles in English, Uzbek, and Karakalpak languages, focusing on how these terms reflect cultural, linguistic, and industrial differences. Light industry and textile terminology is crucial for understanding how these fields are represented and communicated across languages with distinct historical and cultural backgrounds. In English, the terms predominantly consist of Greek and Latin roots, reflecting the international nature of industrial development. The structure of English textile terms tends to be concise and formal, often adopted globally due to the English language’s dominance in trade and manufacturing. Uzbek and Karakalpak languages, however, display rich borrowing from Russian, Persian, and Arabic, mirroring historical influences from these regions. The study reveals that terms in Uzbek and Karakalpak are often compound or descriptive, reflecting a more synthetic linguistic structure. Additionally, these terms encapsulate local cultural and practical nuances tied to indigenous textile practices, which differ from the more globalized context of English terms.
Downloads
References
Acar, M., & Salay, E. (2020). Textile Terminology and Its Structural Features in English. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 16(1), 25-35.
Hanks, P. (2018). Metaphors We Live By in the Textile Industry. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(4), 275-290.
Myers, M. (2019). The Linguistic Development of Synthetic Textile Terms in English. Journal of Textile History, 22(2), 103-120.
Arslanov, A. (2018). Language contact and borrowing in Turkic languages: The case of Uzbek and Karakalpak. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 22(4), 112-128.
Bekmuratov, K. (2017). The influence of Russian on textile terminologies in Central Asian languages. Turkic Languages Quarterly, 15(3), 45-58.
Benson, M. (2020). Fashion terminologies: A cross-linguistic perspective on loanwords in English. Fashion Studies Review, 9(2), 25-39.
Ismailov, N. (2021). Word formation in Uzbek and Karakalpak languages: A comparative study. Turkic Linguistics Journal, 12(3), 72-88.
Kurbanov, M. (2019). Semantic analysis of textile terms in Uzbek and Karakalpak. Central Asian Journal of Linguistic Research, 5(1), 33-45.
Kurmanov, A. (2021). Lexical borrowing in the industrial sector: A case study of Karakalpak. Turkic and Central Asian Studies, 14(2), 57-68.
Nurmatov, U. (2018). Semantic development of loanwords in Uzbek textile terminology. Uzbek Journal of Language Studies, 11(2), 22-38.
Rahimov, T. (2020). The role of loanwords in modern Uzbek textile industry terminology. Linguistic Evolution, 8(3), 53-70.
Safarov, A. (2019). Historical perspectives on textile terms in Persian and Turkic languages. Eurasian Linguistics Review, 6(2), 40-56.
Shanahan, R. (2019). Compounding and derivation in English textile terms: A historical study. Journal of English Lexicology, 24(1), 67-80.
Taylor, J. (2020). Textile terminology in English: From antiquity to modern industry. Language in Industry, 18(2), 34-49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gulbakhar Sratdinova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.