THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP ENGLISH ESSAY AND LETTER WRITING SKILLS

Authors

  • Khodjakulova Nargiza Lecturer of the University of the Uzbek Language and Literature named after Alisher Navoi, Tashkent

Keywords:

online metacognitive strategies,, online essay and letter writing,, Online Survey of Writing Strategies (OSOWS)

Abstract

In the digital advanced technology age, online writing has become an important issue for research in the educational field. People write even if they socialise or look for some information in the Internet. This study reports on an investigation into the effect of explicit teaching of online metacognitive strategies on writing comprehension. This study was carried out on 30 female intermediate level EFL school teachers, who received 12 hours of instructive facilitation on essay and letter writing by a language teaching online Moodle platfom (www.skillsup) in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. The participants were assigned into the experimental and control groups. Before giving the instruction, the Online Survey of Writing Strategies (OSOWS) was administered in order to find out the online writing strategies used by EFL learners. In the experimental group, the researcher explicitly taught online metacognitive strategies through modeling whereas the method used for the control group was implicit and moodle platform-based. A pre-test post-test design was followed and the data were collected through online essay and letter writing tests. The results revealed that online essay and letter writing comprehension by the experimental group improved significantly. The findings show that explicit teaching of online metacognitive strategies could be beneficial in EFL intermediate classes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Bown, J., & White, C. J. (2010). Affect in a self-regulatory framework for language learning. System, 38(3), 432-443. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.03.016

. Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2011). The bounds of adult language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(04), 553-580. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000264

. Ferris, D. (1995). Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 18-22.

. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive– developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi: 10.1037/0003- 066X.34.10.906

. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274-290.

. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.

. Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitive growth of ESL student writers. TESL-EJ, 3(1), 1-20.

. Kruschke, J. K. (2006, June). Learned attention. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Development and Learning, Bloomington, IN.

. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954

. Markus, H., & Sentis, K. (1982). The self in social information processing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 41-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13-23. doi: 10.1207/S1532985EP3501_3

. Norman, C. C., & Aron, A. (2003). Aspects of possible self that predict motivation to achieve or avoid it. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 500-507. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00029-5

. O’Brien-Moran, M., & Soiferman, L. K. (2010, March). How an understanding of cognition and metacognition translates into more effective writing instruction. In L. Martin (Chair). Theories and theorizing. 11th Annual Education Graduate Student Symposium conducted at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University.

. Rogers, R. J. (2010). Incorporating metacognitive strategy training in ESP writing instruction: English for lawyers. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 3-6.

. Ruan, Z. (2005). A metacognitive perspective on the growth of self-regulated EFL student writers. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 175-202.

. Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2013.863901

. Ruvolo, A. P., & Markus, H. R. (1992). Possible selves and performance: The power of self- relevant imagery. Social cognition, 10(1), 95-124.

. Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University.

. Schoonen, R., Gelderen, A. V., Glopper, K. D., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53(1), 165-202. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

APPENDIX A:

METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS INVENTORY (MAI)

(Schraw & Dennison, 1994)

Check True or False as appropriate. Use the Scoring Guide after completing the inventory.

True False

I ask myself periodically if I am meeting my goals.

I consider several alternatives to a problem before I answer.

I try to use strategies that have worked in the past.

I pace myself while learning in order to have enough time.

I understand my intellectual strengths and weaknesses.

I think about what I really need to learn before I begin a task

I know how well I did once I finish a test.

I set specific goals before I begin a task.

I slow down when I encounter important information.

I know what kind of information is most important to learn.

I ask myself if I have considered all options when solving a problem.

I am good at organizing information.

I consciously focus my attention on important information.

I have a specific purpose for each strategy I use.

I learn best when I know something about the topic.

I know what the teacher expects me to learn.

I am good at remembering information.

I use different learning strategies depending on the situation.

I ask myself if there was an easier way to do things after I finish a task.

I have control over how well I learn.

I periodically review to help me understand important relationships.

I ask myself questions about the material before I begin.

I think of several ways to solve a problem and choose the best one.

I summarize what I’ve learned after I finish.

I ask others for help when I don’t understand something.

I can motivate myself to learn when I need to

I am aware of what strategies I use when I study.

I find myself analyzing the usefulness of strategies while I study.

I use my intellectual strengths to compensate for my weaknesses.

I focus on the meaning and significance of new information.

I create my own examples to make information more meaningful.

I am a good judge of how well I understand something.

I find myself using helpful learning strategies automatically.

I find myself pausing regularly to check my comprehension.

I know when each strategy I use will be most effective.

I ask myself how well I accomplish my goals once I’m finished.

I draw pictures or diagrams to help me understand while learning.

I ask myself if I have considered all options after I solve a problem.

I try to translate new information into my own words.

I change strategies when I fail to understand.

I use the organizational structure of the text to help me learn.

I read instructions carefully before I begin a task.

I ask myself if what I’m reading is related to what I already know.

I reevaluate my assumptions when I get confused.

I organize my time to best accomplish my goals.

I learn more when I am interested in the topic.

I try to break studying down into smaller steps.

I focus on overall meaning rather than specifics.

I ask myself questions about how well I am doing while I am learning

something new.

I ask myself if I learned as much as I could have once I finish a task.

I stop and go back over new information that is not clear.

I stop and reread when I get confused.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-12

How to Cite

Khodjakulova Nargiza. (2021). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP ENGLISH ESSAY AND LETTER WRITING SKILLS. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 1(01), 100–109. Retrieved from http://mentaljournal-jspu.uz/index.php/mesmj/article/view/56

Issue

2021, Issue No1

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Khodjakulova Nargiza

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.