THE IMPACT OF TEACHER FEEDBACK VS AUTOMATED FEEDBACK ON WRITING DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
This article examines the impact of teacher feedback versus automated feedback on writing development. With the increasing integration of technology in education, automated feedback systems have gained popularity as efficient tools for assessing and improving writing skills. However, there is an ongoing debate about their effectiveness compared to traditional teacher feedback. This research explores the advantages and limitations of both feedback types by analyzing their influence on students’ writing progress, accuracy, and engagement. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data from writing assessments with qualitative insights from student perceptions and experiences. Findings aim to provide a deeper understanding of how feedback mechanisms contribute to writing development and inform educators on best practices for integrating technology-based feedback into teaching.
Keywords
How to Cite
References
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2020). The impact of automated writing evaluation. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1–18.
Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated feedback systems in language learning. CALICO Journal, 35(3), 323–351.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback. Language Testing, 31(1), 39–64.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 171–196.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nasiba Abduganiyevna Turakulova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
