METHODOLOGY OF DEVELOPING STUDENTS' PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE ON THE BASIS OF SPEECH ACTS
Abstract
The present article is devoted to the theoretical foundations and practical methodology of developing the pragmatic competence of language-learning students through the framework of speech act theory. Pragmatic competence - the learner's ability to use language appropriately in social context, to perform and interpret communicative functions, and to relate utterances to the speaker's intentions — is increasingly regarded as a central, yet frequently neglected, component of communicative competence. The article situates pragmatic competence within the influential models of Hymes, Canale and Swain, and Bachman, and then turns to the speech act theory of Austin and Searle as the principal analytical instrument for describing what learners actually need to learn. It distinguishes pragmalinguistic from sociopragmatic knowledge, examines the phenomenon of pragmatic transfer and cross-cultural pragmatic failure, and reviews the empirical evidence in favour of explicit instruction. Building on this foundation, the article proposes a staged, five-phase methodology - diagnosis, awareness-raising, input and noticing, controlled and communicative practice, and assessment - and illustrates it with concrete classroom techniques for teaching requests, apologies, refusals, complaints, suggestions and compliments. The contribution of the article is a coherent, theoretically grounded yet classroom-applicable procedure that teachers may adopt to make the pragmatic dimension of language an explicit object of instruction
Keywords
How to Cite
References
. Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962. – 168 p.
. Searle, J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. – 203 p.
. Searle, J. R. A classification of illocutionary acts // Language in Society, 1976, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1–23.
. Hymes, D. On communicative competence // J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972, pp. 269–293.
. Canale, M., Swain, M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing // Applied Linguistics, 1980, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–47.
. Bachman, L. F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. – 408 p.
. Leech, G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983. – 250 p.
. Thomas, J. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure // Applied Linguistics, 1983, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 91–112.
. Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. – 345 p.
. Kasper, G., Rose, K. R. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. – 352 p.
. Bardovi-Harlig, K. Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? // K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 13–32.
. Ishihara, N., Cohen, A. D. Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2010. – 354 p.
. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., Kasper, G. (Eds.). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1989. – 300 p.
. Crystal, D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. – 480 p.
. Taguchi, N. Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going // Language Teaching, 2015, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 1–50.
. Cohen, A. D. Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? // Language Teaching, 2008, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 213–235.
. Olshtain, E., Cohen, A. D. The learning of complex speech act behaviour // TESL Canada Journal, 1990, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 45–65.
. Schmidt, R. Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics // G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 21–42.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shahnoza Jurakulovna Rahimova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.