COGNITIVE-LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF “SHAME” IN ENGLISH: COGNITIVE PROCESS AND LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION OF “SHAME”
Abstract
This article offers a cognitive-linguistic analysis of the concept of "shame" in English. It explores the lexical items and expressions related to shame and examines how they are understood and used in different contexts. Additionally, it compares shame-related words and phrases across various cultures to identify cultural variations in the understanding and expression of shame. Drawing from cognitive theories and linguistic analysis, it explores the conceptualizations, categorizations, and embodied experiences associated with shame. It examines the cognitive processes involved in shame, such as the activation of negative self-perceptions, social evaluative concerns, and the impact on one's self-worth. Additionally, the role of linguistic expressions, metaphors, and cultural influences in shaping and communicating shame is investigated. This analysis contributes to a deeper comprehension of shame from a cognitive linguistic perspective, facilitating cross-cultural comparisons and potential clinical implications
Keywords
How to Cite
References
. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge University Press.
. Divjak, D., & Gries, S. T. (2012). Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantics. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(4), 671-702.
. Heine, B., & Miyashita, Y. (2019). The interplay between culture and cognition: A cognitive linguistic account of cultural conceptualizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(3), 539-565.
. Yu, N. (1998). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. John Benjamins Publishing.
. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.
. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press.
. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-251). Cambridge University Press.
. Aijmer, K. (2009). Shame talk: Constructions and consequences of shame in interactional discourse. John Benjamins Publishing.
. Turner, M. (2000). The truth about metaphor: Variations on the body-schema theme in the conceptualization of anger. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3-4), 145-162.
. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.
. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. MIT Press.
. Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan and Dwight Atkinson (1994) ARCHER and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers, Zürich 1993. Amsterdam.
. Freiburg - LOB Corpus of British English (‘FLOB’). Freiburg: Albert-LudwigsUniversität Freiburg, Englisches Seminar [accessed in October 2005].
. Barcelona-Sánchez, Antonio (1996) On the Concept of Depression in American English: A Cognitive Approach. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 12, 7–33.
. Damasio, Antonio (2003) Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Orlando: Harcourt.
. Kaufman, Gershen (1996 [1989]) The Psychology of Shame: Theory and Treatment of Shame-Based Syndromes. 2nd edition. New York: Springer.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shakhodat Omonova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
