THE IMPORTANCE OF TECHNOLOGY OF PREPARING FUTURE PEDAGOGUES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/mesmj-V5-I1-21Abstract
This article focuses on the technological approaches employed in preparing prospective educators for effective engagement with the international evaluation system, with a specific emphasis on the Republic of Karakalpakstan. The article examines the intricate intersection of technology, pedagogy, and international evaluation frameworks to identify innovative strategies and methodologies for enhancing the competencies of future educators. By highlighting successful practices and addressing challenges in integrating technology into pedagogical practices, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the globalization of education and the role of technology in preparing educators for the demands of international evaluation systems.
Downloads
References
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.
UNESCO. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367237
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. New Media Consortium.
American Evaluation Association. (2018). Guiding Principles for Evaluators. Retrieved from https://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51
Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and Educational Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Buse, K., Mays, N., & Walt, G. (2012). Making Health Policy (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421-443.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1999). The Learning Dimension: A Concept Paper on Evaluation and Learning for Foundations. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Smith, N. L. (2014). How to Develop a Learning Plan. Educational Leadership, 72(5), 81-82.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175-182.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Sarsenbaeva Z. CROSS-CULTURAL INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LITERATURE //Евразийский журнал технологий и инноваций. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 10. – С. 146-149.
Sarsenbaeva Z. J. Pedagogical possibilities for improving linguocultural competence by means of studying proverbs //Colloquium-journal. – Голопристанський міськрайонний центр зайнятості= Голопристанский районный центр занятости, 2021. – №. 5-2. – С. 22-24.
Sarsenbaeva Z. COMPARING LINGUISTIC DEVICES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK NON-REALISTIC WORKS //Молодые ученые. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 15. – С. 32-34.
Сарсенбаева З. и др. Expression of proverbs in the present indefinite tense with translations in Karakalpak and Russian languages //Молодой ученый. – 2018. – №. 18. – С. 471-473.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ruslanbek Radjapov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
