THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LANGUAGE COMPETENCES FOR NON-PHILOLOGICAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

Authors

  • Maftuna Shermatovna Omonova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/mesmj-V5-I2-27%20

Abstract

This article deals with the crucial role of language competences in the academic and professional success of non-philological education students. In an increasingly interconnected world, where communication spans diverse linguistic and cultural landscapes, the ability to navigate and express ideas effectively is paramount. Non-philological education students, often pursuing disciplines outside language-focused fields, are frequently confronted with situations demanding proficient language skills. The significance of this study lies in recognizing the impact of language competences on these students' overall educational experience and future career prospects. The study will delve into existing literature to establish a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between language competences and academic achievement among non-philological education students. By identifying gaps in the current body of knowledge, the research seeks to contribute insights into areas that necessitate further exploration and improvement. Moreover, the investigation will explore the practical implications of enhanced language skills in non-philological disciplines, shedding light on how improved communicative abilities can positively influence critical thinking, academic performance, and cross-cultural understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, A. (2020). Language Competence and Academic Success in Non-Philological Education. Journal of Education Research, 25(3), 123-145.

Chen, L. (2020). Cognitive Benefits of Language Learning in Non-Philological Disciplines. International Journal of Cognitive Studies, 15(2), 67-82.

Garcia, M. (2019). Challenges in Developing Language Competences: A Case Study of Non-Philological Education Students. Educational Challenges Journal, 8(1), 45-60.

Johnson, R. (2019). Multilingualism and Global Competence in Non-Philological Education. Journal of Multilingual Education, 12(4), 201-218.

Kim, S. (2022). Language Competence Challenges and Interventions in Non-Philological Education. Language Education Review, 30(1), 89-104.

Li, J. (2021). Multilingualism and Academic Success: A Longitudinal Study of Non-Philological Education Students. Modern Language Journal, 40(2), 345-362.

Liu, W. (2021). Bridging Disciplines Through Language Competences: Insights from Non-Philological Education. Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 18(3), 215-230.

Martinez, P. (2017). Language Competences and Professional Advantages: A Comparative Analysis of Non-Philological Graduates. Journal of Career Development, 28(2), 89-104.

Rodriguez, A. (2016). Language Competences and Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Non-Philological Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 21(3), 145-162.

Smith, K., et al. (2018). The Impact of Language Competences on Academic Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Non-Philological Education Students. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 567-584.

Yang, Q. (2019). Global Competence Through Language Competences: A Case Study of Non-Philological Education Programs. Journal of Global Education, 22(1), 67-82.

Williams, E. (2018). Cognitive Advantages of Language Learning: Evidence from Non-Philological Education Settings. Cognitive Psychology Journal, 12(3), 145-162.

Lucas, T., & Grinberg, J. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In The California State University System. Educational Policy Institute.

Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509-532.

Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual Matters.

Graddol, D. (2006). English Next: Why global English may mean the end of 'English as a Foreign Language'. British Council.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press.

Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Marian, V., & Shook, A. (2012). The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science, 2012, 13.

Utebaev T., Sarsenbaeva Z. Sprachliche analyse von sprichworten. Berlin Studies Transnational Journal of Science and Humanities. Vol. 1 Issue 1.5 Pedagogical sciences.

Сарсенбаева З. Ж. ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ПОВЫШЕНИЯ ЛИНГВОКУЛЬТУРОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ СРЕДСТВАМИ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ПОСЛОВИЦ //Colloquium-journal. – Голопристанський міськрайонний центр зайнятості, 2021. – №. 5 (92). – С. 22-24.

kizi Sarsenbaeva Z. J. LINGUISTIC DIFFERENCES CONTRIBUTE TO VARYING INTERPRETATIONS OF SYMBOLS IN NON-REALISTIC WORKS.

kizi Sarsenbaeva Z. J. THE NUANCED ANALYSIS OF IMAGES AND SYMBOLS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK NON-REALISTIC WORKS. 2023.

Сарсенбаева З. и др. СЛОВЕСНЫЕ ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ЕДИНИЦЫ В ИДИОМАХ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ И КАРАКАЛПАКСКОМ ЯЗЫКАХ //СТУДЕНТ ГОДА 2018. – 2018. – С. 146-148.

Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. McGraw-Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Shermatovna Omonova , M. (2024). THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LANGUAGE COMPETENCES FOR NON-PHILOLOGICAL EDUCATION STUDENTS. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 5(02), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.37547/mesmj-V5-I2-27