THE CURRENT STATE OF SUMMARY WRITING IN UZBEKISTAN AND AROUND THE WORLD
Abstract
The current status of summary writing in Uzbekistan and around the world is examined in this research. It examines current developments in research, assessment, and pedagogy for summary writing while contrasting Uzbekistan's circumstances with others throughout the world. Taking into account elements including language ability, resource accessibility, and the requirement for culturally appropriate teaching methods, the study highlights the main obstacles and possibilities facing Uzbekistan. The paper aims to inform future research initiatives and pedagogical interventions in Uzbekistan by synthesizing existing research and drawing on pertinent examples. This will help students develop strong summary writing skills and contribute to the global conversation on efficient summary methods in academic contexts.
Keywords
How to Cite
References
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Luhn, H. P. (1958). The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2(2), 159-165.
Marcu, D. (2000). The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. MIT Press.
Nenkova, A., & McKeown, K. (2011). Automatic Summarization. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 5(2-3), 103-233.
Radev, D. R., Blair-Goldensohn, S., & Zhang, Z. (2001). Experiments in single and multi-document summarization using MEAD. First Document Understanding Conference (DUC-01).
World Bank. (2019). Uzbekistan: Modernizing the education system. World Bank Report.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dilnoza Turdibekova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
