THREE-DIMENSIONAL FRAMEWORK OF POSTMETHOD PEDAGOGY IN ELT
Abstract
Postmethod pedagogy represents a paradigm shift in English Language Teaching (ELT), moving beyond rigid, prescriptive methods to embrace a dynamic, context-sensitive framework. Central to this approach is Kumaravadivelu's three-dimensional framework, comprising particularity, practicality, and possibility, which prioritizes contextual adaptation, the integration of theory and practice, and the transformative potential of education. This article explores these dimensions, drawing on insights from Kumaravadivelu and Stern, to demonstrate how postmethod pedagogy reshapes ELT practices. Challenges and implications for teacher education are also discussed, highlighting the need for professional development to support reflective, autonomous, and critical practices.
Keywords
Postmethod pedagogy, English Language Teaching, Kumaravadivelu, Stern, particularity, practicality, possibility, reflective practice, teacher autonomy, critical pedagogyHow to Cite
References
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2012). How to teach English with technology. Pearson.
Edge, J. (2011). The reflexive teacher educator in TESOL: Roots and wings. Routledge.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. Continuum.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford University Press.
Mercer, N. (2013). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Munisa Tursunova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
